On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:07:09PM -0500, Karen Thomas wrote:
> >>>> it's not like the information isn't there, and i don't see a whole lot
> of use in replacing those who'd rather have say an arab or an appy with an
> icelandic.
> 
> That doesn't really make sense.  How would someone KNOW they'd "rather have
> an arab or an appy" if they haven't seen what Icelandic's really are?  

didn't someone on this list recently say they made a list and went to
the internet?  or personally, i had an instructor give me a lesson on my
lease-horse at the time (an arab) and end up talking to me about
icelandics.  in neither case do i think "meeting one" came first.  (that
said, one of my own hopes for promoting the breed is seeing if stjarni
makes a good parade horse -- but then i'm sure i'll take a bundle of
grief here for presenting him as a "circus pony".)

> >>> there's always going to be a largish supply available from iceland, at
> least for the foreseeable future, because of their breeding and rearing
> practices.
> 
> I, for one, would never buy an imported Icelandic, not knowing the big risk
> a horse coming into the eastern part of the USA has for summer eczema.

it might interest you to know there's currently a vaccine trial going on
in iceland on this issue, as well as much medication work.  for me, it
wasn't even a question: after i met stjarni, *he* was it, and if he
develops sweet itch it'll just be something to deal with, like my own
chronic illnesses of various sorts.  

> Frankly, I think it's rather cruel that people keep importing them, knowing
> how high the chances are that the horses will suffer, when domestic-bred
> horses (of all breeds) have very low risks.  

it's 20-30% in imported iceys, and 3-7% in horses of all breeds.  this
is certainly a large difference, but i don't know that it's profound.
last year at our barn the sweet-itch victim was a morgan/friesian cross,
not an icey (and her case was horrible, and *not* being an icey i think
delayed her proper diagnosis and treatment).

> or an Icelandic that had a 50+% chance of being miserable half the year

where did you get this figure?  and what makes you say that the disease
is so unmanageable that the horse is guaranteed misery?

--vicka

Reply via email to