---- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
> i just had one of my cats microchipped, which seems like an infinitely
> easier, safer, and more information-dense technique.  any ideas on why
> it has not been more widely adopted with horses...?

One reason immediately pops to mind:   A micro-chip cannot be read at a 
distance can it?  So anytime someone wanted to identify a certain wild horse, 
they would have to capture it -- assuming they had the right one to begin with 
--  to get close enough scan it.

-- Renee M.     

Reply via email to