Am 21.01.2015 um 19:44 schrieb Michael Martinez:
I currently manage an Icinga 1.x environment where we’re seeing high
(1200s+) latencies on our servers that are monitoring upwards of 4000
service checks and 600 host checks. I have done a lot of tuning of the
icinga performance parameters but have been unable to reduce this
latency.
One of the projects we are considering is upgrading to Icinga 2.x in
order to leverage the Clustering functionality. My question is whether
the performance engine in 2.x is any better than in 1.x? If I upgrade
my environment, keeping the number of icinga servers constant, will I
see noticeably lower latencies?
I imagine this is a function of two things: leveraging the
clustering/distributed stuff; and whether the performance engine was
overhauled and rewritten for 2.x?
If we cant’ squeeze any better performance out of this, then
unfortunately we’re going with a different monitoring solution that
scales better.
There are several locations answering these questions:
https://www.icinga.org/icinga/icinga-2/why-icinga-2/
http://docs.icinga.org/icinga2/latest/doc/module/icinga2/chapter/about-icinga2#icinga2-in-a-nutshell
hth
Michael
--
Michael Martinez
_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
--
https://twitter.com/dnsmichi
https://github.com/dnsmichi
http://www.legendiary.at
_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
