On 10.10.2013 13:19, Carl Wolff wrote: > Hello, > > I experimenting with the following network setup in a large office: > * 1 core switch > * 48 switches (2 per floor) > * 750 power over ethernet switches > * On every PoE switch 8 end-nodes > > We want to monitor every(! )node (including end-nodes) on availability, > that is a total of (8*750)+750+48+1 = 6799 nodes. > > If I enter this in icinga, i end up with a very slow performing status > map, filled with circles cluttered with end nodes who's description > cannot be read... > > How can above problem be mitigated? Do I need more hierarchy?
I'd say the classic ui statusmap was not designed for that large numbers. Either try the icinga web statusmap, or hop onto NagVis like Carl already mentioned. https://wiki.icinga.org/display/howtos/NagVis -- DI (FH) Michael Friedrich mail: michael.friedr...@gmail.com twitter: https://twitter.com/dnsmichi jabber: dnsmi...@jabber.ccc.de irc: irc.freenode.net/icinga dnsmichi icinga open source monitoring position: lead core developer url: https://www.icinga.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ icinga-users mailing list icinga-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icinga-users
