blom baca karena bahasa linggis saya jelek. jadi kesimpulannya borok android dan google ada hubungannya dengan open flatform itu gimana om?
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Andi - leo5354 <leo5...@se-ven.net> wrote: > ** > Google translate aja bro > Artikel ini wajib dibaca oleh mereka yg mengagungkan Android sebagai > "open" platform karena dalam artikel ini beberapa borok Android dan Google > dibeberkan secara lugas dan jelas > Nice share buat authornya karena membantu kita memandang hal dari suatu > perspektif yg jelas dan didukung fakta, bukan asal ngomong tp ngga nyambung > To work, to sweat and to struggle is the enjoyment and achievement of life > ------------------------------ > *From: * Andika Ikhsan <ikhsan.and...@gmail.com> > *Sender: * id-android@googlegroups.com > *Date: *Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:18:49 +0700 > *To: *<id-android@googlegroups.com> > *ReplyTo: * id-android@googlegroups.com > *Subject: *[id-android] WTI - Hate Android > > tadi liat twitter ada TT "Hate Android" > ternyata asalnya adalah dari artikel ini.. > http://parislemon.com/post/15604811641/why-i-hate-android > jujur bahasanya rada njelimet dan ada hubungannya sama sejarah android yg > saya sendiri ga paham.. mungkin ada yg bs ngasih penjelasan soal fakta2 yg > disebut di artikel ini? > > > *HATE ANDROID* > > Why do I hate Android? It’s definitely one of the questions I get asked > most often these days. And most of those that don’t ask probably assume > it’s because I’m an iPhone guy. People see negative take after negative > take about the operating system and label me as “unreasonable” or “biased” > or worse. > > I should probably explain. > > Believe it or not, I actually don’t hate Android. That is to say, I don’t > hate the *concept* of Android — in fact, at one point, I loved it. What I > hate is what Android has become. And more specifically, what Google has > done with Android. > > Let’s turn back the clock. In 2006, the mobile landscape in the United > States was almost unfathomably shitty. Motorola’s RAZR had been the > top-selling device for something ridiculous like five straight years — and > the only thing that didn’t suck about it was its physical size. The > carriers completely controlled the industry. This cannot be overstated. > > Then on January 9, 2007 — exactly 5 years ago today — Steve Jobs took the > stage at Macworld to unveil the iPhone. Six months later it was released. > While some laughed it off <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXq9NTjEdTo> at > the time, the mobile landscape completely changed. > > Apple and Google were great allies at the time. They united over a common > enemy: Microsoft. Then-Google CEO Eric Schmidt was even on Apple’s board of > directors. Google was a huge part of original iPhone OS (before it was > called iOS): Google Maps, YouTube, Google Search, etc. Apple could have > launched the iPhone without Google, but it wouldn’t have been as good. And > if they had to do something like build their own maps from scratch, it > would have taken longer. > > A few months later, on November 5, 2007, Google teamed up with many of the > big players in the mobile/telecom space to announce the Open Handset > Alliance. At the time it sounded promising, but perhaps it should have been > the first warning sign. The first product of this partnership: Android. A > beta was released, but it would take almost another year before the > software was actually ready to go. > > The initial Android > prototypes<http://gizmodo.com/334909/google-android-prototype-in-the-wild?tag=gadgetsandroidhardwareinthewild>looked > a lot like BlackBerry devices (both in hardware and software). But > the first device (the G1) and OS actually released was more of a cross > between a T-Mobile Sidekick (which Android head Andy Rubin helped create > while still a co-founder at > Danger<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danger_%28company%29>) > and the iPhone OS. > > In hindsight, Steve Jobs was clearly not happy about > this<http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/steve-jobs-android-a-stolen-product/61504>and > the subsequent iPhone-ification of Android. But great artists steal, > etc, etc. The only thing I didn’t like about Android at the time was that > it was a *shitty* copy of the iPhone. It was something you couldn’t pay > me to use. And most people seemed to feel the same way. > > Jobs probably didn’t say much at the time because he didn’t have to. The > market was saying it. > > Time went on and it was pretty clear that despite the major players > involved in the OHA, Android wasn’t getting a lot of traction. Meanwhile, > the iPhone, after a price-cut and addition of 3G technology, was soaring. > So Google did the logical thing, they went to see Verizon, the largest U.S. > carrier, and struck a > deal<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33192558/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/verizon-google-android-partnership/#.Twuk997uYug> > . > > Remember, Apple still had an agreement with AT&T for exclusive iPhone > rights in the U.S. at the time. Verizon and Google needed each other. But > Google clearly needed Verizon more. This was the first real problem. A deal > with the devil was struck. > > Let’s back up for a second. > > Even before Android’s launch, Google clearly had big dreams for the mobile > space. “Your mobile phone should be free,” Eric Schmidt > told<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15700344/>Reuters in late 2006. He > envisioned a world in which consumers didn’t have > to pay for their mobile phones — advertising (served by Google, naturally) > would subsidize the cost. And we’re not talking “free” with a two-year > carrier contract. We’re talking *free* free. > > In the pre-iPhone world this may have sounded like crazy-talk. But > remember, as an Apple board member and having purchased Android for Google > in 2005, Schmidt knew what was coming down the pipe. He absolutely intended > to disrupt the mobile market. > > But again, the initial releases of Android simply didn’t have the traction > needed to come close to fulfilling Schmidt’s (and Google’s) dream. So deals > with the carriers had to be made. > > Still, Google hung on to the hope of a free phone. That phone was called > the Nexus One. > > At an event in January of 2010, Google unveiled their plan for Nexus One — > the first real “Google Phone” as it were. While they were cautious and > cagey with some details, the goal seemed clear: Google intended to blow up > the carrier market (in the U.S. first) by moving phone distribution online, > flattening it in the process. The idea was that you’d go to a website and > pick the phone you wanted, then pick the *carrier* you wanted, pay, and > you’d be done. > > Think about this for a second. Instead of going to the store of a single > carrier and having a dozen shitty phones shoved in your face by salespeople > that made commission, you’d be in total control of the process. The end > result of consumers getting to choose their carriers (and phones and plans) > was clear: major competition and subsequently a rush of better deals from > said carriers to ensure customer activation and retention. > > Or, you could buy whatever phone you wanted *unlocked*. Eventually, > pay-as-you-go SIM cards would pop up in the U.S. as a result. > > This was to be the dawn of the golden age of mobile in this country. As I > wrote at the time: Apple And Google Just Tag Teamed The U.S. > Carriers<http://techcrunch.com/2010/01/05/apple-google-carriers/>. > I loved it. > > But it was never meant to be. > > What should have been obvious at the time but for whatever reason wasn’t > (maybe because carrier representatives were at the event), the carriers > hated this plan. And for good reason — it was going to turn them into dumb > pipes that competed on price. There was no way they were going to let this > fly, and they didn’t. Within a few months, citing weak sales of the Nexus > One, Google scrapped their ambitious website and instead got fully in bed > with the carriers. > > But there was more. > > What no one knew at the time, and I only heard months > later<http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/10/google-nexus-one/>, > was Google’s original vision for the Nexus One. Google intended to sell it > for $99 without a contract and unlocked. Yes, a $99 unlocked phone, > subsidized by Google ads. > > But the plan had one little problem: Google didn’t operate their own > cellular network. They needed Verizon or AT&T or Sprint or T-Mobile to help > them out. Google probably thought their open spectrum deal > “win”<http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/20/did-google-trick-verizon-into-spending-billions-for-a-spectrum-auction-win/>in > early 2008 gave them the leverage they needed here. Sadly, it did not. > > All of the carriers laughed in Google’s face when presented with the > ambitious Nexus One plan. And given that Google had just signed the > all-important deal with Verizon, it was never going to happen. > > So instead, at the Nexus One launch we got a website where you could > indeed buy an unlocked Android phone — for $529. Nonstarter. > > Better yet, while they said they were committed at the time, Verizon and > Sprint never even got around to supporting the Nexus One *at all*. That’s > how much they were behind the project. > > To complicate matters further, behind the scenes, Verizon and Google were > arguing over Net Neutrality rules. Verizon was opposed, Google was in > favor. Then a funny thing happened. Google started supporting Verizon’s > viewpoint on the matter! If you’re looking for the first post where I’m > really, truly, pissed off at Google, look no further. > > It. Was. Total. Fucking. > Bullshit.<http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/13/google-net-neutrality/> > > A few months later, guess what happened? Thanks to the Google/Verizon > alliance on the matter, the FCC decided the compromised vision of Net > Neutrality was just fine > also<http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/21/verizon-google-fcc-net-neutrality/>. > To be clear: Net Neutrality was thrown out in the wireless space because > Google sided with Verizon’s ridiculous and horribly conflicted stance on > the matter. > > The open spectrum enemy, turned Net Neutrality enemy, became Google’s > bedmate thanks to a business deal. Straight up. Greed, for lack of a better > word, is good. > > We got all of this thanks to Google’s desire for Android to take over the > world. I commented earlier that they signed a deal with the devil — I > wasn’t being facetious. They actually did! And they got away with it! > > I think about these things everyday that I see positive news about > Android. It’s so wonderful that the platform which helped cripple Net > Neutrality and is keeping the evil carriers in control is taking off. Make > no mistake: Android is now the carriers’ best friend. > > Because Google sloppily decided to do the Motorola deal (driven by the > full-on patent war <http://techcrunch.com/2011/07/09/vesper/>, for which > Apple and Microsoft, and not Google, are largely to blame), and because the > model isn’t great for all but the biggest > player<http://parislemon.com/post/15418182445/one-out-of-three-aint-bad>, > now the OEMs may be our best hope against the carrier/Android alliance. > > Eventually, many of them will try to do their own thing (perhaps even > using Android as a base) because they’re not idiots, they see where the > real money is: controlling the entire experience. Like Apple. > > All of this backstory knowledge fuels my rage. When I see Google talk > about how “open” the platform > is<http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/09/android-open/>, > setting it up as the foil to the “closed” (and framed as “evil”) iPhone, I > want to scream and rip someone’s head off. It’s not only the most extreme > example of being disingenuous that I can ever recall seeing — it’s nuclear > bullshit. > > Apple, for all the shit they get for being “closed” and “evil”, has > actually done far more to wrestle control back from the carriers and put it > into the hands of consumers. Google set off to help in this goal, then > stabbed us all in the back and went the complete other way, to the side of > the carriers. And because they smiled the entire time they were doing it > and fed us this “open” bullshit, we thanked them for it. We’re still > thanking them for it! > > When you think about it in the context of this election season we’re > entering, it’s a brilliant political maneuver that Google has pulled off > with Android. They’ve taken something they’ve done that’s actually bad for > us and spun it in such a way that most people actually buy into it being > good for us. > > And for the carriers, Android is the best thing ever because it’s the new > “opiate > for the masses <http://parislemon.com/post/15200195253/clopen>”. > Everything shitty they’re doing is great because they’re doing it with > Android — at least it’s not iOS. What a load of horseshit. > > I realize that the Android team at Google has a lot of good people doing > great work. I know some of them. I respect them. But I cannot respect their > decision to continue to work on this platform that perpetuates our > imprisonment. I have to believe most simply chose not to think about these > things. But they should. They really should. > > There’s no denying that there are upsides to open — a lot of them. But in > the case of Android, “open <http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/26/open/>” has > been hijacked and wildly contorted so as to mask the shady side of what’s > really been going on. And it’s working. > > So that, ladies and gentleman, is why I hate Android. It has nothing to do > with the actual product (which continues to improve every year and is > quite good now<http://techcrunch.com/2011/12/14/iphone-galaxy-nexus-review/>). > It has to do with a promise that was broken and swept under the rug. > > As crazy as it may sound to some of you, beyond a full OEM revolt (which > could ultimately benefit the carriers as well), our hope now lies with > Apple and Microsoft. > > Apple, because they put the consumer first and have proven time and time > again that they will not bend to carrier bullshit and will often work > against them behind the scenes. And they control the all-important Apple > stores for distribution (and, of course, the App Store). > > Microsoft, because they have a model (many handsets on all carriers) that > can potentially scale better than Apple’s can while still giving control > (mostly) to the users. And they have Nokia on board with their plan. And > they have intersections with products like Xbox. (Though it may be too > late in the > U.S.<http://parislemon.com/post/14840209963/the-windows-phone-problem-in-three-words-way-too-late> > ) > > Perhaps more people will relate to this: I hate Android for the same > reason that Severus Snape hates Harry Potter — the very sight reminds me of > something so beautiful, that was taken. Except it’s worse. It’s as if Harry > Potter has grown up to become Voldemort. > > -- > "Indonesian Android Community" Join: http://forum.android.or.id > > =============== > Download Aplikasi Kompas versi Digital dan Keren > https://market.android.com/details?id=com.kompas.android.kec > -------------------------- > Gunakan Paket Unlimited Data XL Mobile Broadband > http://www.xl.co.id/XLInternet/BroadbandInternet > -------------------- > PING'S Mobile - Plaza Semanggi > E-mail: i...@pings-mobile.com Ph. 021-25536796 > -------------------- > Toko EceranShop - BEC Bandung > E-mail: wi...@eceranshop.com Ph. 0815-56599888 > =============== > > Aturan Jualan dan Kloteran ID-Android http://goo.gl/YBN21 > > -- > "Indonesian Android Community" Join: http://forum.android.or.id > > =============== > Download Aplikasi Kompas versi Digital dan Keren > https://market.android.com/details?id=com.kompas.android.kec > -------------------------- > Gunakan Paket Unlimited Data XL Mobile Broadband > http://www.xl.co.id/XLInternet/BroadbandInternet > -------------------- > PING'S Mobile - Plaza Semanggi > E-mail: i...@pings-mobile.com Ph. 021-25536796 > -------------------- > Toko EceranShop - BEC Bandung > E-mail: wi...@eceranshop.com Ph. 0815-56599888 > =============== > > Aturan Jualan dan Kloteran ID-Android http://goo.gl/YBN21 > -- Be first, be better, or cheat.™ -- "Indonesian Android Community" Join: http://forum.android.or.id =============== Download Aplikasi Kompas versi Digital dan Keren https://market.android.com/details?id=com.kompas.android.kec -------------------------- Gunakan Paket Unlimited Data XL Mobile Broadband http://www.xl.co.id/XLInternet/BroadbandInternet -------------------- PING'S Mobile - Plaza Semanggi E-mail: i...@pings-mobile.com Ph. 021-25536796 -------------------- Toko EceranShop - BEC Bandung E-mail: wi...@eceranshop.com Ph. 0815-56599888 =============== Aturan Jualan dan Kloteran ID-Android http://goo.gl/YBN21
