Without going to the details, it is possible to design an ACE which has almost the resultant length as UTF-8 if "10-byte limit" is your concern. -James Seng > > But (assuming careful choice of the ACE) few ACE IDNs are likely to be > > significantly longer than UTF-8 IDNs, > > That simply isn't true. A 10-byte limit causes much more trouble for the > ACE proposals than for UTF-8. Try some examples! > > ---Dan >
- Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-uri-00.tx... Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-uri-00.txt D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-uri-00.txt Maynard Kang
- Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-uri-00.tx... D. J. Bernstein
- ACE length in e-mail addresses (was: Re: ... Maynard Kang
- [idn] Sendmail usage estimates D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-uri-0... Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-u... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-... Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-i... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-... James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-i... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-i... James Seng/Personal
