On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, John C Klensin wrote:
> --On Tuesday, 16 January, 2001 16:01 +0900 GIM Gyeongseog-KIM
> Kyongsok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, John C Klensin wrote:
> >
thanks for your exmpales.
> No, except that the DNS supports synchronized changes to
> coordinated entries very poorly.
...
> But, if, e.g., one implements this as (using IPv4 as an example)
> as
>
> <hangeul-domain-name>. IN A 10.1.2.3
> <english-name-for-same-enterprise>. IN A 10.1.2.3
>
> And then tries to make a change, such as to re-home the host,
> the two names may, due to differences in usage, take
> significantly different times to propagagate.
i am somewhat confused here. this situation can happen
with ordinary (i.e., non-IDN) domain names.
i would like to know whether you claim the above problem is
the DNS problem in general or a problem specific with IDNs?
> john
�� �漮, �λ�� ���� ��ǻ�� ���к�;
KIM Kyongsok/GIM Gyeongseog, Busan National Univ.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://HANGEUL.cs.pusan.ac.kr/hangeul/
Ph: (051) 510-2292, Fax: (051) 515-2208
