Russ Rolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > could someone kindly post a simple list of the reasons they feel "Just > do pure UTF-8" is *not* a valid alternative. Domain names appearing in message headers, SMTP commands, URIs, etc. are required by various standards to contain only ASCII letters, digits, hyphens, and dots. Therefore there is no telling what existing software would do if faced with domain names containing other characters. Some of it would surely break. DNS is not the problem. AMC
- [idn] iDNS transition: end-system vs. infrastructure? Dave Crocker
- RE: [idn] iDNS transition: end-system vs. infrastruc... Russ Rolfe
- Re: [idn] iDNS transition: end-system vs. infrastruc... Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] iDNS transition: end-system vs. infrastruc... Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] iDNS transition: end-system vs. infrastruc... John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] iDNS transition: end-system vs. infrastruc... Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] iDNS transition: end-system vs. infrastruc... John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] iDNS transition: end-system vs. infrastruc... Adonis El Fakih
- Re: [idn] iDNS transition: end-system vs. infrastruc... Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] iDNS transition: end-system vs. infrastruc... Michael Mealling
- RE: [idn] iDNS transition: end-system vs. infrastruc... David C Lawrence
