At 05:19 PM 5/25/2001, Keith Moore wrote: > > Jumping to assert the correctness of a particular solution has proved > > problematic, here. > >No doubt about that either. But I don't think I've made any such assertions. Unfortunately, that is exactly what you did. Re-read the way you asserted a particular solution. >There is a point beyond which you're not likely to get any agreement on the >nature of the problem. I think we reached that point several months ago. I thought we did, too, but the fact that there is lack of clarity about the sense of urgency was a rather surprising suggestion that that we have NOT reached that point. d/ ---------- Dave Crocker <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com> tel: +1.408.246.8253; fax: +1.408.273.6464
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Mark Davis
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- RE: [idn] report of the straw poll Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] report of the straw poll Keith Moore
