I would like to hear some support on this before we run this poll. -James Seng ----- Original Message ----- From: "D. J. Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 12:25 PM Subject: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-term IDN solution > I suspect that we have consensus that the long-term IDN solution will > encode Unicode characters as UTF-8 on the wire. I request that the WG > chairs run a poll to see whether we have consensus. > > If we do, in fact, have consensus on this point, then we can stop > wasting time considering ACE-now-and-forever. We can instead compare > the actual possibilities: (1) ACE-now-UTF-8-later; (2) simply UTF-8. > > ---Dan > > P.S. I'm not going to bother responding to Hoffman's ad-hominem attacks. >
- [idn] UTF-8 as the long-term IDN solution D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-term IDN solution Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-term IDN solution James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-term IDN solution Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-term IDN solution Sherin Alsoudani
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-term IDN solution Bruce Thomson
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-term IDN solution Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-term IDN solution John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-term IDN solution Mats Dufberg
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-term IDN solution Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-term IDN solution Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-term IDN solution Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-term IDN solution Paul Hoffman / IMC
