> > I suspect that we have consensus that the long-term IDN solution will > > encode Unicode characters as UTF-8 on the wire. I request that the WG > > chairs run a poll to see whether we have consensus. > > > > If we do, in fact, have consensus on this point, then we can stop > > wasting time considering ACE-now-and-forever. We can instead compare > > the actual possibilities: (1) ACE-now-UTF-8-later; (2) simply UTF-8. > I would like to hear some support on this before we run this poll. > > -James Seng > It is likely that we have consensus on this point, and it would be well worth the effort of a straw poll to establish this, so we can move on. Bruce Thomson
- [idn] UTF-8 as the long-term IDN s... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-t... Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-t... James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-t... Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-t... Sherin Alsoudani
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-t... Bruce Thomson
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-t... Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-t... John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-t... Mats Dufberg
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-t... Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-t... Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-t... Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-t... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-t... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-t... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] UTF-8 as the long-t... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
