> Perhaps if we use UCS directly then the "count" can actually be the > number of Unicode code points and every language will have 63 > "character" spaces to use. Allowing for 63 characters (instead of 63 octets) per label by way of EDNS would certainly help to motivate adoption. I think that it is probably also feasible to adopt a "continuation" syntax in ACE as part of a backwards compatibility. Perhaps a special byte sequence (like soft-hyphen) could be reserved for this purpose, allowing a pair of ACE labels to be interpreted as a single label. -- Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
- [idn] Who supports UDNS (ACE+UTF-8... Dan
- Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (... Edmon
- Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (... John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (... Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (... Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (... Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (... Marc Blanchet
- Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (... James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (... deng
- Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (... Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (... Mark . Andrews
- Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (... Edmon
