"Adam M. Costello" wrote:
> 
> "Eric A. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I think that it is probably also feasible to adopt a "continuation"
> > syntax in ACE as part of a backwards compatibility.
> 
> This has been proposed before.  It's certainly a clever idea, but
> it's not clear that it wouldn't create more compatibility problems.

Yeah, very difficult. This has been what's been keeping my own dual-mode
draft from being finished. You raised some good points, but the one that
has me bugged is the max length; providing continuation labels just moves
the problem to the max length restriction, rather than really fixing it.

-- 
Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/

Reply via email to