Re: [idn] Unicode tagging

[Keith Moore]

> > > Wouldnt using uniform byte-length characters largely solve the problem?...

> > no.  that would just make the queries and responses larger than necessary.

> This is not true... UTF-8 is consistently lengthier for Chinese than UCS-2

UTF-8 is not the only alternative to uniform length encoding.
there are already better proposals than either uniform length encoding
or UTF-8.

Keith