> > Wouldnt using uniform byte-length characters largely solve the problem?... > > no. that would just make the queries and responses larger than necessary. > This is not true... UTF-8 is consistently lengthier for Chinese than UCS-2 > Keit Edmon
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging RJ Atkinson
- [idn] Unicode tagging Edmon
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Edmon
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Edmon
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging RJ Atkinson
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging James Seng
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging RJ Atkinson
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Edmon
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging James Seng
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Randy Bush
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Edmon
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Edmon
- RE: [idn] Unicode tagging Jonathan Rosenne
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Paul Hoffman / IMC
