At 19.08 -0400 00-08-27, Marc Blanchet wrote: >same for ipv6: slow deployment (but steady) because no direct (a lot >of indirect actually) advantage for the user. A user don't want an >ip address, he wants a service. Major problem with IPv6 are two: - Policy at RIRs not reday yet - Efficient code for routers doesn't exist yet Both of them will be fixed this year is my guess. paf
- [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA James Seng
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA James Seng
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA A. Vine
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Marc Blanchet
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Marc Blanchet
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Bill Manning
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Maynard Kang
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA James Seng
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA A. Vine
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA John C Klensin
