At 14.05 -0700 00-08-27, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote: >Where he and I agree is that, if the IDN protocol requires that many >DNS severs and caches need to be upgraded, getting to 90% might take >ten years or more. I am not so worried about DNS servers, but for intermediaries for applications, like SMTP MTAs and SMTP gateways to Lotus Notes, X.509 certificate software etc. paf
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA A. Vine
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Marc Blanchet
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Marc Blanchet
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Bill Manning
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Maynard Kang
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA James Seng
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA A. Vine
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Bill Manning
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: [idn] New protocol proposal: IDNRA Keith Moore
