PTR has a failing which IPTR attempts to address, ie, locale info (language info). So a Japanese application may choose the Japanese IDN for the IP and the Korean application may choose the Korean IDN for the IP. How useful it is subjected to debate of cos. -James Seng Randy Bush wrote: > > multiple names for one ip is a red herring (idiom for something which > distracts one from the proper path). > > 666.42.7.1.in-addr.arpa. PTR my.dom.ain. > PTR another.dom.ain. > PTR yet.another.name. > > is perfectly legal and in common use. > > randy
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted James Seng
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Hongbo Shi
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Marco d'Itri
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Hongbo Shi
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted James Seng
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Randy Bush
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted James Seng
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted James Seng
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Mark Davis
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted James Seng
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Mark Davis
- Plane 14 history (Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR ... Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Hongbo Shi
