At 09:17 19/09/2000 +0800, James Seng wrote: > > 3. The Unicode consortium does not encourage use of the plane 14 language > > tags. When language tagging is necessary, it should be done with a higher > > protocol (such as xml:lang in XML, or HTTP accept-lang). > >As Paul told me, Plane 14 is been inserted at the request of IETF. I suppose >there is a reason why IETF want this. It would be more correct to say that Plane 14 was adopted by the Unicode Consortium in reaction to a proposal in the IETF to use illegal UTF-8 codes to encode language tags in plain text. The Unicode consortium does not like the idea of language tags in plain texts, but liked even less the idea that this should be done using illegal UTF-8 sequences, so they provided an alternative. Thus.... -- Harald Tveit Alvestrand, [EMAIL PROTECTED] +47 41 44 29 94 Personal email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted James Seng
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted James Seng
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Mark Davis
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted James Seng
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Mark Davis
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Hongbo Shi
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted jiang
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Bill Manning
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Marc Tamsky
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Harald Alvestrand
