jiang, I don't think IPTR is cleaner if you have to write the code to support it verses not having to write/change anything to use harald's approach. I much prefer not introducing another RR Type. -rick On Thu, 21 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > > I still feel IPTR is a cleaner approach, thou I do see the many benifits in > Harald's suggestion. >
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Mark Davis
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted James Seng
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Mark Davis
- Plane 14 history (Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR d... Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Hongbo Shi
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted jiang
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Bill Manning
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Marc Tamsky
- Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted Harald Alvestrand
