jiang,

I don't think IPTR is cleaner if you have to write the code to support it
verses not having to write/change anything to use harald's approach.

I much prefer not introducing another RR Type.

-rick

On Thu, 21 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> 
> I still feel IPTR is a cleaner approach, thou I do see the many benifits in
> Harald's suggestion.
> 


Reply via email to