Hi!
From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-lace-00.txt
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:27:51 -0800
> >Would you please explain explicitly who are we?
> "We" are everyone in this working group.
Thank you.
> > Some registries
> >including JPNIC are starting multilingual domain name testbed.
> I hope you are doing so in a more controlled fashion than VeriSign
> is. :-) It is good to hear that you are doing some testing; please be
> sure that any results you find are reported back to the group.
Yes, sure :-)
I'm trying to write I-D as a report of Japanese characters and
canonicalization rules of multilingual domain names according to
JPNIC's technical bylaws.
If I did it, I will report it at next IETF meeting.
> > I
> >strongly recommend all ACEs, including tha same ACE with different
> >version, SHOULD have different identifieres.
>
> This can be done, but it should be done carefully so that we don't
> re-use a name that is already in use by someone. If the group wants
> to have a set of prefixes for different ACEs, such a list could be
> prepared.
Yes, I agree with you. I'm also trying to write I-D of ACE identifier
definition process.
BTW, is it a bad idea to choose LACE identifier as ra-- or aq8, that
were obsoleted RACE identifiers for testing?
P.S.
The name of LACE has a big problem for me. That is, I can't
recognize difference RACE and LACE in conversation X-(
Would you please pronounce RACE and LACE as "R" ACE and "L" ACE
respectively :-)
--
Yoshiro YONEYA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
aka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
