--On 01-07-18 06.46 +0000 "D. J. Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What went wrong is that the browser displayed the address as Unicode > characters. The address then passed through the (CTEXT UTF-8, although > UTF8_STRING would be better) copy-and-paste mechanism, the UTF-8 xterm, > the mail client, and the 8-bit-clean MTA, none of which converted back > to ACE. The resulting UTF-8 DNS lookup produced NXDOMAIN. In the IDNA proposal we have specified that an application which handle IDNA (like you seem to say that the browser is) only support IDNA if also the content of the clipboard is converted to ACE before the domainname is passed to other applications (which doesn't handle IDNA/ACE solution). paf
- RE: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Colosi, John
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth David Hopwood
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Martin Duerst
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Martin Duerst
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Martin Duerst
- RE: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Patrik F�ltstr�m
- RE: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Brian W. Spolarich
- RE: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Edmon
- RE: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth lucid
