Yes, that's fine. Bruce
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:33 PM Subject: Re: [idn] Question for the Kanji & Hanja cognosentee > One Kanji to one unique ACE, is this good enough? > That is you do not allow one Kanji has several > ACE, such as Kanji to Romaji case. Is this correct? > > Liana > > On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 09:28:44 +0900 "Bruce Thomson" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Right. There should be no folding between Kanji and > > other forms, as it is not even possible to do it well > > by table lookup. > > > > Also, in my opinion there should be no folding > > amongst the two types of kana and Romaji either, > > even it could be done easily enough. This might be > > controversial, as the fastidious Bank of Japan > > demonstrated by registering over twenty forms > > of its name in the .com testbed (Kanji, hiragana, > > katakana, for .com, .net, and .org, in addition to > > the Romaji names registered previously.) > > > > Bruce > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 3:12 AM > > Subject: Re: [idn] Question for the Kanji & Hanja cognosentee > > > > > > > So for Kanji shall be handled like Chinese character, > > > which means each shall be treated as an icon with > > > itsown independency? Am I right? > > > > > > Liana > > > > > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2001 17:24:10 +0900 Martin Duerst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > writes: > > > > At 00:54 01/08/17 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > >If Hangul mapped to Latin letters like Romaji and then > > > > >add a number to select one Kanji among a few > > > > >homophones, can this be good enough to idnetify a Hanja > > > > >name in DNS? > > > > > > > > > >The same question goes to Bruce Thomson: > > > > >Can Romaji be revered back to Kanji-Kana sequece with > > > > >near 100% rate (with or without case ending)? > > > > > > > > Not at all. There are some cases where you can guess, > > > > and there are cases where even guessing won't really > > > > help. Of course adding a number or so always will be > > > > able to do disambiguation, but one would essentially > > > > have to use a separate number per kanji, because in > > > > Japanese, new readings can be invented anytime. > > > > > > > > Regards, Martin. > > > > > > > > >
