Martin
I agree. we must consider Hanja and Kanji.
so we must find a feasible solution to avoid that. though the solution maybe not
perfect.
do you think it is impossible to find that?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Duerst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John C Klensin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Harald Tveit Alvestrand"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence
> At 07:31 01/08/29 -0400, John C Klensin wrote:
> >And, unless whatever is done is isolated -- through procedures,
> >structure, or layering-- in a way that is robust, accessible to
> >all users of URLs based in the Chinese language, and that does
> >not fragment the Internet, we also need to be sure that the
> >tables and mechanisms that do SC/TC equivalence don't
> >accidentally map Kanji or Hangul into SC.
>
> No problem for Hangul, which is a completely different script.
> But for most Hanja (ideographs as used in Korea) and many Kanji
> (only many because some are already the same as SC, and in
> some cases, Japan has it's own simplifications), there is
> absolutely no chance to be successful (i.e. only map SC/TC,
> but not Hanja or Kanji). If that's the requirement (and I
> agree it is), then we don't have to continue the discussion.
> Sorry if I disappoint anybody :-(.
>
> Regards, Martin.
>
