Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand]

--On 29. august 2001 10:59 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>
> That is the reason I propose to increase radical section in
> Unicode to cover 1000 radicals, and for WG to agree a versioning
> table to include GB, Big5, KSC, JIS to transliterated ACE map.

OK, so this proposal cannot be acted on by the IETF until the proposal for 
additional radicals in Unicode has been accepted.

Then I think it is not a possible solution at the timescale when this group 
is planning to deliver a product.

Thank you for the clarification.

          Harald