to my mind, it seems that you can have keyword search with near-perfect TC/SC equivalence, OR cut-and-paste URLs and email addresses without TC/SC equivalence. Not both in the same part of the user interface at the same time. --On 30. august 2001 14:55 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > To the keyword type of solutions, it is good for name > registration only. It is slow and painful, a good toy to > study with, but not good to use as day to day tool, > especially unthinkable if I want cut and paste type of > URL implementation. So, I am agaist keyword search > type of e-mail addresses, but still interested in > any solutions to guess how it can be implemented in > English.
- Re: [idn... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [idn] opt... liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn... xiaodong lee
- Re: [idn... Martin Duerst
- Re: [idn] opt... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [idn... tsenglm@計網中心.中大.tw
- Re: [idn] opt... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] opt... liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn... James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] opt... liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn] opt... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [idn... Martin Duerst
- Re: [idn] opt... liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn... tsenglm@計網中心.中大.tw
- Re: [idn] opt... liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn] opt... tsenglm@計網中心.中大.tw
- Re: [idn] opt... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] opt... tsenglm@計網中心.中大.tw
- Re: [idn... David Hopwood
- Re: [idn] opt... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [idn] opt... tsenglm@計網中心.中大.tw
