At 15:31 01/10/19 +0900, Soobok Lee wrote: >Second) If we take into consideration the additional length of subdomains of a >IDN, the total length of <ML-subdomain>.<ML>.com often exceeds >14. ANd if we think about mailbox name in [EMAIL PROTECTED], it will exceed 20. >IN that case, the Sum of the lengths of saved characters in each >substring in [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be great, around 15~20, i guess.
It is a very long standing lesson when working with computers that in case there is a tradeoff between a more stable and a more compact solution, it's in most cases, and definitely in the long term, much better to take the more stable and simpler one. The Y2K problem is the best example, but there are many other ones. >We should not attempt to draw an upper limit on future applications of >han/hangeul IDN domains by imposing unfair disadvantage on max length >of Han/hangeul labels . I don't see any unfair disadvantage. Both in Latin and in Han/Hangul, it's already possible to make names longer than really useful. To say that overly long names have been cut off at a different point for Latin and for Han or Hangul may be true, but it is rather irrelevant. And even with the most advanced compression, we will never be able to make sure that we are completely fair to everybody. Regards, Martin.
