On October 25th, in reply to David Hopwood, you (James Seng) wrote:

> Last Call is norm but not neccessary. It was agreed on London meeting to
> move forward the doc since there is no comments or any changes proposed

Please note the following:

Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Zita Wenzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], brunner
Subject: Re: [idn] draft-ietf-idn-requirements-07.txt 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:46:34 GMT."
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 21:45:32 -0400

Please also note the following:

Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Marc Blanchet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], brunner
Subject: Re: [idn] new list of wg documents and next steps 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:03:07 EDT."
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 13:29:55 -0400

A killfile isn't an explination, its disfunction.

Eric

Reply via email to