Agree with Martin too. But clarification: whether stringprep should be within IDN wg is a bit more complex. Obviously with the dependency, it should be.
-James Seng > Martin is right: we cannot finish nameprep until stringprep is > finished. If the WG chairs don't want it as part of the WG, that's > fine, but it is going to go through the same IETF last call as > nameprep will. There is no reason not to have it in this WG. > > --Paul Hoffman, Director > --Internet Mail Consortium
