Patrik, I don't buy your reasoning, in either case (guarantees of UTC or JET work product immutability), unless nameprep has a dependency relationship on a reference to a table, rather than to the table itself, at the point at which the relationship was made.
Take a look at rfc954, it references the DDN, SRI-NIC, nets 10 and 26, all as if they are immutable. In spite of the brokenness of the formal external reference, the referant, a protocol on port 43 and some data, continue to exist. I don't much care if the next big thing sweeps the UTC off into oblivion, treating them as if they were the ITU in a working group is peculiar, and doing the same with JET is just as odd. Sweeping the UTC off to oblivion may take more, or less, than the next big thing ;-), but it is a _liaison_ problem, not a WG problem. Its Scott's problem, not "ours". Eric
