Dear James: > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On Behalf Of James Seng/Personal > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 7:31 AM > To: tsenglm@計網中心.中大.tw; Erin Chen > Cc: liana Ye; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [idn] draft about Tradition and Simplified > Chinese Conversion[version01] > > > > The original (SC, TC) pair is keep for checking reference , > but if > > one character has different meanning and usage in different > CJK area, > the > > relation of 1-1 mapping can be reduced to checking-state to let CJK > people > > can keep their local need and also to match the ALL-SC, ALL-TC > approach. > > Okay, let me try to see if I can get this right on the table mappings: > > 1. The original source of the table mapping is from A > Complete List of Simplified Chinese Characters and Dictonary > of Chinese Characters Variant. > The Authority of Complete List of Simplified Chinese Characters is PRC government, It MUST be keep. The draft reference it . > 2. JET members have adopted these tables, combined them into > a single tables. > > 3. JET members then later remove all conflicting cases with > Japanese & Korean pairs from the tables. > > If these are true, then JET could be considered as the > authority for the tables mappings. The implied result is not correct . The original authority of this SC/TC mapping table can not be changed by referencer.
L.M.Tseng
