> > 2. Eric suggest we do two proposal, one with reordering, one without, > > then move on. > > Nope. I wrote that there is a question to the editors (of IDNA etc, not > you and Zita, that would be a waste of time) on the ability to accomodate > two divergent requirements in one set of texts.
Okay, no problem. In other words, I have misread your message as to make a suggestion. Instead, you are posting a question to the editors of IDNA, and therefore, this suggestion 2 is not within the proposal next step. Therefore, there is only one other proposed next step by Bruce, namely to drop reordering and move on. Comments from others please. -James Seng
