At the minimual, there is no rough consensus that reordering is to be added. Therefore, "manditory reordering" is definately not part of the game.
The question remains if we keep reordering in the pool, continue to work on it until we have consensus or we drop it or. Or as what I thought you suggested, to have 2 set of proposals, one with and one without. Or anything else others could think of. -James Seng > > ... > > it is clear from the strawpoll that "manditory reordering" is not the > > rough consensus of the group. > > ... > > Neither is going bowling. The hard part is what _is_ the rough consensus. >
