My apologises. Let me correct myself: DM-IDNS or UDNS are both good starting point, one which the UTF-8 supportor group should go aside and finish it.
-James Seng > James Seng wrote: > > > It is also okay if you wish to start from UDNS, a draft which I find > > it is reasonable altho incomplete. Talk to Oscarsson if you wish but > > lets put it down in writing. > > Dan should certainly be encouraged to resubmit his UDNS proposal, but in > the meantime, I would like to point out that draft-hall-dm-idns-00.txt is > the dual-mode draft that is currently in the WG pool. Perhaps your > confusion stems from the I-D-N.net web site, which still lists UDNS as an > active document, and which does not list DM-IDNS. > > [For the record, message <016c01c14c76$ea176c20$dd00a8c0@jamessonyvaio> > shows that UDNS was removed from the pool on Oct 4, 2001 while message > <023301c172ee$62f4fc50$0701000a@jamessonyvaio> shows that DM-IDNS was > accepted into the WG pool on Nov 22, 2001. Don't rely on the web site.] > > -- > Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ > Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
