> Dan should certainly be encouraged to resubmit his UDNS proposal, but in > the meantime, I would like to point out that draft-hall-dm-idns-00.txt is > the dual-mode draft that is currently in the WG pool. Perhaps your > confusion stems from the I-D-N.net web site, which still lists UDNS as an > active document, and which does not list DM-IDNS.
And for those that are looking at other IDNA to UTF-8 in DNS transitional schemes it would be useful to look at the open issue regarding DNSSEC that I pointed out about draft-hall-dm-idns-00.txt a while back. I suspect that all such transitional schemes will have the same issue when DNSSEC is used to provide integrity of the RRsets: can't depends on servers synthesing records in general and can't have caching resolvers modify the queries and/or responses. Erik
