Edmon Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Agreed... but not convinced that the CJK tables do not have an "intended" > use. At least the T/SC table is already actively being used by a couple of > domain operators.
Ah, see, I knew that was the intent all along. This is another attempt to force IDN to perform 1-to-1 TC/SC mapping by having IETF "publish" the proposed table in the stringprep document and then insisting that IDN implement the conversions specified in the "official" table. TC/SC equivalence is not 1-to-1. Implementations that pretend that it is will confuse and mislead Chinese speakers who expect true, context-based equivalence. Domain operators who implement 1-to-1 TC/SC mapping tables are out of conformance with the IDN proposal. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California
