On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 06:06:26PM +0200, Erik Nordmark wrote: > > I would still like it to be called the ISO 10646 repertoire. > > Doing that change to this added text would be very odd given > that that the rest of the document has no mention of ISO 10646. > Thus I think consistency is the overriding concern here.
Is that not a major change from IETF policy? We should mention ISO standards when they are applicable. Kind regards keld
