Erik Nordmark <Erik dot Nordmark at sun dot com> wrote: > IDNA uses the Unicode character repertoire, which avoids the > significant delays that would be inherent in waiting for a different > and specific character set be defined for IDN purposes by some other > standards developing organization.
I still don't see the point of this passage. It sounds as though some other standards organization would be better equipped to develop a character set than SC 2/WG 1 or UTC, but we're going with Unicode anyway, just for the sake of expediency. Is that the intent? If not, what purpose does the "which" clause serve? -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California
