I think I agree with Martin here.  Channel bindings in GSSAPI V2 have
not proven to be a feature that is as portable or robust as the rest
of the spec.

I think they are a strong candidate for dropping in advancing GSSAPI
V2 to draft.  OF course you cannot just drop them because doing so
would be backward incompatible.  I'm not quite sure how you indicate
this, but Martin's suggested approach seems like a fine idea to run
past the IESG.

But my personal preference is to enhance channel bindings for
cryptographic keys until they can (and are) portably used in GSSAPI V3

--Sam

-++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==
This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list
server.  If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the
message body of "unsubscribe ietf-cat-wg" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to