Sam Hartman wrote:
> 
> This is getting off topic for the list but it seems like linking
> against the threads library may be one case where having unresolved
> (weak) references in your shared object is acceptable.

I strongly disagree.  This is cat-ietf!

Multi-threading issues and how it might affect users of GSS-API
and whether how one could standardize requirements for a
thread-safe GSS-API v3 is well within scope of CAT--or whatever
is left of it :)

-Martin
-++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==
This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list
server.  If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the
message body of "unsubscribe ietf-cat-wg" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to