Sam Hartman wrote: > > This is getting off topic for the list but it seems like linking > against the threads library may be one case where having unresolved > (weak) references in your shared object is acceptable.
I strongly disagree. This is cat-ietf! Multi-threading issues and how it might affect users of GSS-API and whether how one could standardize requirements for a thread-safe GSS-API v3 is well within scope of CAT--or whatever is left of it :) -Martin -++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**== This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list server. If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message body of "unsubscribe ietf-cat-wg" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]