Hiya, On 02/10/2019 22:01, Mark Delany wrote: > What might give it more strength is if many people adopted key swap > otherwise a solitary Snowden-like operative publishing a private key > in an essentially obscure location on the Internet is unlikely to > convince a judge that security thru obscurity is ineffective. So if > private key publishing has legal plausibility value, then a standard > should strengthen that value.
I agree with all you say. If however, we did think it useful to try standardise something then it'd likely be better to start with a read of the paper Jon posted (still not done;-) and any other relevant work. While publishing private keys is simple and v. easy to explain, (and so far still my fav idea for this), it might not be the best thing. S.
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
