On 02Oct19, Jim Fenton allegedly wrote: > The type of surveillance we were discussing at the time was the > potential that the verification of a DKIM signature might give the > sender information on the location of the recipient (by observing the
That is mostly my recollection also. But as you say: > I don't doubt that others (particularly Jon) thought more thoroughly > than I about privacy concerns such as this. And in any event it appear some now think it's a real issue so whether it was thought about much in the past and by who probably isn't that material since it didn't result in any action at the time. > -Jim (who will read the article soon!) Ulp! Now you're gonna make us all feel guilty. Mark. _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
