On Tue 12/May/2020 00:08:15 +0200 Dave Crocker wrote: > On 5/11/2020 1:33 PM, Jim Fenton wrote: > >> There might also be the situation where a domain wants to delegate a key > > Hence my suggestion that figuring out such details is where discussion could > get interesting, if only because people will raise all sorts of combinatorial > theories, independent of demonstrated need, and this is a space with lots of > combinatorials...
Besides delegated keys, some other obvious classes I'd propose —without venturing to forge English keywords— are as follows: * 1st class personal messages (with or without From: restrictions), * mailing lists (with or without From: rewrite), * bulk messages (including transactional confirmations, complaints, ...), * forwarded mail (after severe/loose antispam filtering). Perhaps, the keywords should be dash-separated jumbles of terms chosen from a predefined grab bag, to allow for combinations. On Mon 11/May/2020 21:52:28 +0200 Damon wrote: > ... or is this only to add a layer of (potentially ignored) definitions? Adding the definitions can be useful, given that so many people wonder about what would a DKIM signature certify. On Mon 11/May/2020 20:23:12 +0200 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > Indeed; why would I believe what any given domain claims in this tag? If you trust the domain, you can as well trust their tagging. On Mon 11/May/2020 19:30:10 +0200 Dave Crocker wrote: > Oh, and then figuring out why and how they are useful to provide... Left as an exercise to the reader? Best Ale -- _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
