On Tuesday, May 12, 2020 5:31:30 AM EDT Steve Atkins wrote: > On 12/05/2020 09:20, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > > On Tue 12/May/2020 00:08:15 +0200 Dave Crocker wrote: > >> On 5/11/2020 1:33 PM, Jim Fenton wrote: > >>> There might also be the situation where a domain wants to delegate a key > >> > >> Hence my suggestion that figuring out such details is where discussion > >> could get interesting, if only because people will raise all sorts of > >> combinatorial theories, independent of demonstrated need, and this is a > >> space with lots of combinatorials... > > > > Besides delegated keys, some other obvious classes I'd propose —without > > venturing to forge English keywords— are as follows: > > > > * 1st class personal messages (with or without From: restrictions), > > > > * mailing lists (with or without From: rewrite), > > > > * bulk messages (including transactional confirmations, complaints, ...), > > > > * forwarded mail (after severe/loose antispam filtering). > > > > Perhaps, the keywords should be dash-separated jumbles of terms chosen > > from a predefined grab bag, to allow for combinations. > > Some prior work in this space is TEOS. > > https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301324998_Trusted_Email_Open_Standa > rd_A_Comprehensive_Policy_and_Technology_Proposal_for_Email_Reform
I looked through it. It is so 2003 FUSSP. Scott K _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
