[offlist]

On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 1:21 PM Laura Atkins <la...@wordtothewise.com>
wrote:

>
> On 10 Nov 2022, at 13:17, Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 12:54 PM Laura Atkins <la...@wordtothewise.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In many cases, the reason the mail isn’t going out through the signing
>> domain is because the signing domain’s anti-spam heuristics are good enough
>> that the sender couldn’t maintain an account there long enough to send out
>> any volume of email. That’s why the domain has a good reputation - because
>> they block spam off their network. This is a way to steal the good
>> reputation from the good ESP.
>>
>
> Interesting.  Almost seems like "SPF against the signing domain" could be
> a win, except for all the usual forwarding concerns.
>
>
> I think a lot of it is being blocked and the receiving orgs are aware it’s
> happening and the replays are not contributing that much to the actual
> reputation of the originating domain. Certainly, what I’m hearing from the
> folks who are being used as the signer for the replay is they’re not seeing
> a whole lot of impact on delivery and reputation.
>

Am I reading this right, i.e., you think this is mostly a non-issue because
it's easy to spot and filter?

-MSK
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim

Reply via email to