[offlist] On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 1:21 PM Laura Atkins <la...@wordtothewise.com> wrote:
> > On 10 Nov 2022, at 13:17, Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 12:54 PM Laura Atkins <la...@wordtothewise.com> > wrote: > >> In many cases, the reason the mail isn’t going out through the signing >> domain is because the signing domain’s anti-spam heuristics are good enough >> that the sender couldn’t maintain an account there long enough to send out >> any volume of email. That’s why the domain has a good reputation - because >> they block spam off their network. This is a way to steal the good >> reputation from the good ESP. >> > > Interesting. Almost seems like "SPF against the signing domain" could be > a win, except for all the usual forwarding concerns. > > > I think a lot of it is being blocked and the receiving orgs are aware it’s > happening and the replays are not contributing that much to the actual > reputation of the originating domain. Certainly, what I’m hearing from the > folks who are being used as the signer for the replay is they’re not seeing > a whole lot of impact on delivery and reputation. > Am I reading this right, i.e., you think this is mostly a non-issue because it's easy to spot and filter? -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim