On 11/21/2022 1:56 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I don't want to get into implementation discussions before we even
have a charter, but I'm curious about how this could be made effective.
I'd count it as a simple tool that might have incremental benefit.
Simply give guidance that an MDA SHOULD remove the DKIM signature,
unless there is a local arrangement with the recipient not to.
(Obviously the local detail could swap the default the other way.)
I would expect anything more elaborate to be in the range of diminishing
returns and, therefore, not worth the complexity, effort, etc.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
mast:@[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
