Hey Miles, On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:29 AM Miles Libbey <[email protected]> wrote:
> - the (signed) Date: header would get further in the past the longer a > replay is used, which would/could be a sign of misbehavior > I think this is a decent theory, but with automation, the delta between "Date" and/or the signature timestamp and the first replay can be rather small, certainly smaller than any reasonable first delivery window. It's basically the "x=" problem. > - the message body would still be immutable, and thus subject to bulkiness > detection (for instance tracking the signature's occurrences) > I don't want to get into implementation discussions before we even have a charter, but I'm curious about how this could be made effective. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
