Per Dave's suggestion, I'll take this to the M3 Technical list. When we believe we're well-situated, we'll come back to ietf-smtp or marf.
FWIW, Dispatch suggested the dmarc or dkim lists. Thanks folks, we'll be back. -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 1:05 PM > To: Brotman, Alex <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] DKIM-FBL > > On 9/27/2023 7:41 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > We don't really have a venue that talks about feedback loops that I > > can find, > > I strongly suggest pursuing this first in a group devoted to anti-abuse > email, with a > range of software developers and platform providers. > > This will ensure both subject matter expertise and operational interest. > > If there is enough interest and productivity there, then when the work gets > to a > degree of maturity, pursuing enhancements and formal status, via the IETF, > will > make sense. > > d/ > > -- > Dave Crocker > [email protected] > mast:@[email protected] > 408.329.0791 > > Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter > Information & Planning Coordinator > American Red Cross > [email protected] _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
