Just on this one point; I'll catch up on this thread and the revised charter text later today. (I'm behind due to the US holidays this week.)
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 7:47 PM Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the proponents would be wise to be more visibly open > to serious consideration of (even randomer) IETF input. They > will inevitably get that, and ISTM a "fingers-in-the-ears- > unless-X' approach is tactically unwise, as there are always > people smart enough to re-cast their input as being related > to X, for any X. > I concur, and I would expect the IESG to bristle if they think the charter has any sort of "please just approve this with minimal input" vibe buried in it. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
