On 1/5/2025 7:07 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Am I poking a hornet's nest here, or is it safe to state that this is the commonly understood definition of "DKIM replay"?
it isn't. discussed in my detail comments on the latest draft.
As was brought up elsewhere, do we need to be clear about whether this is expected to be an extension of existing DKIM or ultimately a replacement of it? Or are we keeping our options open, which is what the current text seems to be doing?
the draft specification makes very clear it is a brand new protocol. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net *** bluesky: @dcrocker.bsky.social *** mast: @[email protected] _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
